Komisionieri p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave kroat deklaroi n\u00eb nj\u00eb opinion k\u00ebshillues se skanimi i identitetit dhe kartave bankare t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve mund t\u00eb mos bazohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhjen me nj\u00eb detyrim ligjor sipas nenit 6(1)(c) t\u00eb GDPR pasi asnj\u00eb ligj komb\u00ebtar nuk i k\u00ebrkonte ta b\u00ebnin k\u00ebt\u00eb. Komisioneri p\u00ebrjashtoi gjithashtu vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e p\u00eblqimit t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsit dhe mendoi se, nd\u00ebrsa pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorin interesa legjitime sipas nenit 6(1)(f) t\u00eb GDPR, ata duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb ende n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimet e mbrojtjes s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave sipas nenit 5 t\u00eb GDPR.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb Kroaci, shum\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebs k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb karta identiteti dhe karta bankare t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve t\u00eb tyre p\u00ebr t’i skanuar dhe ruajtur n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e tyre. Komisioneri kroat l\u00ebshoi \u200b\u200bnj\u00eb opinion mbi nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpunim t\u00eb till\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale t\u00eb pun\u00ebtor\u00ebve.<\/p>\n
Ai vuri n\u00eb dukje se q\u00eb p\u00ebrpunimi t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ligjsh\u00ebm, duhet t\u00eb ket\u00eb nj\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore sipas nenit 6(1) t\u00eb GDPR.<\/p>\n
S\u00eb pari, Komisioneri shqyrtoi n\u00ebse p\u00ebrpunimi ishte i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr respektimin e nj\u00eb detyrimi ligjor sipas nenit 6(1)(c) t\u00eb GDPR. Ai vuri n\u00eb dukje se kjo baz\u00eb ligjore duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohet nga ligji i Shtetit An\u00ebtar ose i Bashkimit Evropian. Neni 29(1) i Ligjit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs kroate p\u00ebrcakton se t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat personale t\u00eb pun\u00ebtor\u00ebve mund t\u00eb mblidhen, p\u00ebrpunohen, p\u00ebrdoren dhe u transmetohen pal\u00ebve t\u00eb treta vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse p\u00ebrcaktohet nga ky ose nj\u00eb ligj tjet\u00ebr ose n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme p\u00ebr q\u00ebllimin e ushtrimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs. Sa i p\u00ebrket t\u00eb par\u00ebs, ligji parashikon vet\u00ebm n\u00eb nenin 5 q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb i detyruar t\u00eb mbaj\u00eb sh\u00ebnime q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb informacione p\u00ebr pun\u00ebtor\u00ebt dhe orarin e pun\u00ebs. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb fundit, n\u00ebse p\u00ebrpunimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr ushtrimin e t\u00eb drejtave dhe detyrimeve t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, neni 29(2) i atij ligji thot\u00eb se pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi duhet ta p\u00ebrcaktoj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb paraprakisht me Rregulloren e Pun\u00ebs. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Komisioneri p\u00ebrcaktoi se ligji kroat i pun\u00ebs nuk vendos nj\u00eb detyrim ligjor p\u00ebr pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit p\u00ebr t\u00eb kopjuar ose skanuar dokumentet e identitetit ose kartat bankare t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve t\u00eb tyre. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, neni 6(1)(c) GDPR nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret si baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpunim t\u00eb till\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale.<\/p>\n
S\u00eb dyti, Komisioneri shqyrtoi n\u00ebse p\u00eblqimi\u00a0mund t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbente p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur baz\u00ebn ligjore p\u00ebr p\u00ebrpunimin sipas nenit 6(1)(a) t\u00eb GDPR. Ai doli n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin q\u00eb p\u00eblqimi i t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet si nj\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr p\u00ebrpunimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve ose punonj\u00ebsve t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 n\u00ebse ata mund t\u00eb refuzojn\u00eb p\u00ebrpunimin pa pasoja negative p\u00ebr ta. Komisioneri vuri n\u00eb dukje se punonj\u00ebsit rrall\u00ebher\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb q\u00eb lirisht t\u00eb japin, refuzojn\u00eb ose t\u00ebrheqin p\u00eblqimin e tyre p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb var\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb tyre nga pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. Prandaj, me p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb rrethanave t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme, pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit duhet t\u00eb mb\u00ebshteten n\u00eb ndonj\u00eb baz\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ligjore p\u00ebrve\u00e7 p\u00eblqimit.<\/p>\n
S\u00eb fundi, Komisioneri vuri n\u00eb dukje se pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorin potencialisht interesat e tyre legjitime si nj\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr p\u00ebrpunimin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb sipas nenit 6(1)(f) t\u00eb GDPR, megjith\u00ebse kjo do t\u00eb varej nga m\u00ebnyra se si do t\u00eb arrihej ekuilibri midis interesave t\u00eb tyre legjitime dhe interesave t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve t\u00eb tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb rast t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, ai paralajm\u00ebroi se edhe me nj\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshme p\u00ebr p\u00ebrpunim, pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb respektojn\u00eb parimet e mbrojtjes s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave sipas nenit 5 t\u00eb GDPR, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb parimin e minimizimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. Kjo k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat personale duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshme, relevante dhe t\u00eb kufizuara n\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme n\u00eb lidhje me q\u00ebllimet p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat ato p\u00ebrpunohen.<\/strong> Komisioneri dyshonte, p\u00ebr shembull, se numri i verifikimit (CSC, CVV ose HVS) i nj\u00eb karte bankare, e cila sh\u00ebrben si d\u00ebshmi e posedimit fizik t\u00eb kart\u00ebs n\u00eb momentin e blerjes online, do t\u00eb ishte informacion i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr q\u00ebllimin e pages\u00ebs s\u00eb pag\u00ebs s\u00eb punonj\u00ebsit. Prandaj, n\u00ebse v\u00ebrtetohet nj\u00eb interes legjitim p\u00ebr kopjimin ose skanimin e kart\u00ebs bankare t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsit, duhet t\u00eb zbatohen masat e duhura teknike n\u00eb lidhje me t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb nevojshme (p\u00ebr shembull, disa t\u00eb dh\u00ebna mund t\u00eb ken\u00eb nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb redaktohen).<\/p>\n burimi: gdprhub.eu<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Komisionieri p\u00ebr mbrojtjen e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave kroat deklaroi n\u00eb nj\u00eb opinion k\u00ebshillues se skanimi i identitetit dhe kartave bankare t\u00eb punonj\u00ebsve mund t\u00eb mos bazohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhjen me nj\u00eb detyrim […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":26543,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[93],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26308"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26308\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26357,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26308\/revisions\/26357"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonimpresa.albaniainsight.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}